🔗 Share this article

When I am a game master, I usually steered clear of heavy use of chance during my tabletop roleplaying sessions. I preferred was for the plot and what happened in a game to be shaped by player choice as opposed to the roll of a die. Recently, I chose to alter my method, and I'm truly pleased with the outcome.

The Catalyst: Seeing an Improvised Tool

An influential streamed game features a DM who regularly requests "fate rolls" from the players. This involves selecting a specific dice and defining consequences tied to the number. It's at its core no unlike rolling on a random table, these are created on the spot when a course of events doesn't have a predetermined resolution.

I decided to try this method at my own session, primarily because it looked interesting and offered a break from my usual habits. The outcome were remarkable, prompting me to reconsider the perennial tension between preparation and randomization in a D&D campaign.

A Memorable In-Game Example

During one session, my group had survived a large-scale conflict. When the dust settled, a player asked about two key NPCs—a pair—had lived. Instead of picking a fate, I asked for a roll. I instructed the player to roll a d20. I defined the outcomes as: a low roll, both would perish; on a 5-9, only one would die; a high roll, they survived.

The player rolled a 4. This triggered a deeply poignant sequence where the characters discovered the bodies of their allies, forever united in death. The cleric performed funeral rites, which was especially meaningful due to earlier character interactions. In a concluding reward, I improvised that the forms were miraculously transformed, revealing a magical Prayer Bead. I rolled for, the item's magical effect was precisely what the party lacked to solve another pressing quest obstacle. You simply orchestrate such serendipitous moments.

Honing DM Agility

This incident caused me to question if improvisation and making it up are actually the essence of D&D. Even if you are a meticulously planning DM, your improvisation muscles can rust. Adventurers reliably find joy in upending the best constructed narratives. Therefore, a skilled DM needs to be able to adapt swiftly and invent details on the fly.

Using similar mechanics is a excellent way to practice these skills without venturing too far outside your usual style. The strategy is to deploy them for small-scale circumstances that don't fundamentally change the overarching story. For instance, I would avoid using it to determine if the king's advisor is a secret enemy. But, I might use it to determine if the characters enter a room right after a critical event unfolds.

Enhancing Shared Narrative

Spontaneous randomization also works to make players feel invested and cultivate the sensation that the story is alive, progressing according to their decisions in real-time. It combats the perception that they are merely characters in a DM's sole narrative, thereby bolstering the shared nature of the game.

Randomization has always been embedded in the original design. The game's roots were enamored with random tables, which suited a playstyle focused on dungeon crawling. Even though contemporary D&D frequently focuses on story and character, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, this isn't always the required method.

Finding the Right Balance

Absolutely no problem with being prepared. But, equally valid nothing wrong with letting go and letting the whim of chance to decide some things in place of you. Control is a major aspect of a DM's responsibilities. We use it to facilitate play, yet we frequently find it hard to give some up, even when doing so might improve the game.

A piece of suggestion is this: Don't be afraid of temporarily losing the reins. Experiment with a little chance for smaller outcomes. The result could discover that the surprising result is infinitely more memorable than anything you would have scripted on your own.